In the 2024 audit, released Monday, the state determined the missteps were a result of the city implementing the new software for utilities, permitting and capital assets during its financial accounting period. The overlap led to the limited time for staff to thoroughly review records, according to the audit report.
“As a result, city employees were unable to dedicate sufficient time and resources to implementing prior audit recommendations,” the report states.
According to the 2024 audit, the city did not have a reliable process to ensure its capital assets were reported correctly.
The audit found three issues:
- The city did not adequately evaluate and adjust the lifespan of its capital assets. Capital assets can include buildings, infrastructure or land.
- An independent review of the city’s records of financial transactions wasn’t detailed enough to make sure the records were accurate and complete.
- The city’s process for reviewing financial statements was insufficient in ensuring the reports were accurate or complied with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, standard guidelines for accurate financial accounting and reporting.
“When taken together, they represent a significant deficiency,” the audit report said.
The report highlighted the effects of the errors:
- Because the city did not regularly analyze the lifespan of its capital assets, $47 million in assets were reported as fully depreciated when those assets were still useful.
- The city underreported the value of donated land by an unknown amount. The city recorded the actual costs it paid to acquire the land, rather than the fair market value it would have paid for the donated property.
- The city inaccurately recorded $681,990 in capital assets — funds allocated to capital projects — as internal service funds, which are used to track the costs of providing services within a government entity.
- The city used an inaccurate amount of unspent bond money in its investments in capital assets — which inflated the balance by more than $1.3 million.
- The city inaccurately reported $293,801 in its error correction amount.
The city corrected the last three errors, according to the audit report, adding safeguards to avoid future issues.